Legal Opinion
Millet ex rel. Millet v. Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 2003No. Nos. 02-CA-1096, 02-CA-1097PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2McMANUS, Judge.
At issue in this consolidated case, is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ exception of no cause of action. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff filed the instant suit on her daughter, Victoria Lynn Millet’s, behalf arising from the same incident as her original petition for damages. The following facts are taken from Millet v. Treasure Chest Casino L.L.C., 00-1843 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/30/01), 788 So.2d 713, writ denied, 01-1908 (La.10/5/01), 799 So.2d 485.
In this case, plaintiff, Vicki M. Millet, filed a petition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberts v. BenoitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Toups v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Lewis v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Butler v. K-Mart Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Kulka v. ShagLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Tracey D. Kulka v. Shag II, Inc. D/B/A the Bulldog Pool Hall" "Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012