Legal Opinion
In Re Jones
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 22, 1994No. 19-80455PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUSAN PIERSON SONDERBY, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Jay and Betty Jones’ (“Debtors”) Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien of Pinnacle Bank/Harvey. 1 The Court denies the Debtors’ request for rehef.
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1334 and General Rule 2.33(A) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (K) and (0).
BACKGROUND
On March 5, 1993, Jay and Betty Jones filed a petition for relief under…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Sandor Chabot in Re Betty B. Chabot, Debtors. City National Bank v. Sandor Chabot Betty B. ChabotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Harris v. Herman (In Re Herman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re GiordanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- In re MayerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015