Legal Opinion
Kortney Dempsey v. Norwegian Cruise Line, a Foreign Corporation, a Division of Kloster Cruise Limited
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1992No. 91-35212PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed May 8, 1992, is redesignated as a per curiam opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Dempsey appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Norwegian Cruise Line (Norwegian). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We review the district court’s summary judgment de novo. Tzung v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 873 F.2d 1338, 1339 (9th Cir.1989). We must determine “whether, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Eulala Shute and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Thomas Deiro v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4Cited by25 opinions
- Wallis v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wang Laboratories, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Paul G. Kagan, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Wallis v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Walker v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.