Legal Opinion

Holland v. Altmeyer

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1945No. Civil Action 1033PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The above cause came before the Court on defendants’ motion for a summary judgment on the grounds that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law and for judgment in accordance with Section 405(g), Title 42 U.S. C.A., affirming the decision of the Social Security Board, and as to which the petitioner herein has proceeded to obtain a review.

The facts appearing in the record and which seem relevant are as follows: When the petitioner herein resigned in April, 1942, from his position as District Agent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Walker v. AltmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Social Security Board v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Caroline B. Ferenz v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Fuller v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
  3. Irvin v. HobbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  4. Ussi v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
  5. Bostick v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API