Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Quanta Computer Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Dissent
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge,
dissenting as to Section III.B.
I agree with my colleagues with respect to the result and judgment reached, but I must dissent as to that portion of the opinion 'and judgment at Section III.B. Specifically, I disagree with my colleagues’ decision to decide the difficult issue of contributory infringement on the basis of policy concerns without due regard for the text of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) and am of the opinion that the majority makes three errors in its analysis. First, the majority ignores the fact that Quanta does not sell or offer to sell the accused components, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.