People v. Ruttenbur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: We have reviewed the issues raised by defendant in his pro se brief and we find all, except one, without merit. Defendant contends that the People failed to prove that the three police officers he allegedly assaulted with a pocket knife sustained physical injuries as defined by Penal Law § 10.00 (9). We conclude that the bruises suffered by Officer Webster, which were “very painful” for three or four days, and the deeper cut to Sergeant Rossolo’s head, which caused “sharp pain”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Philip A.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. JimenezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. OquendoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. GrimsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. BeatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.