Hall v. Barnard
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court.— Hon. David Mould, Judge. Suit to recover damages for the breach of a contract not to re-engage in business. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtSiierwin, J.
In his pleadings the plaintiff claimed that he entered into an oral contract with the appellants for the purchase from them of the Havana Café in Sioux City, *524with its fixtures, furnishings, and good will'for $2,700; that he paid for the property and good will according to the terms of the agreement, and took possession thereof, and conducted the business connected therewith; that soon thereafter the defendants, in violation of their agreement, purchased and operated the Savery Hotel and Café in Sioux City; and that they not only secured a large number of the plaintiff’s patrons, but they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Day v. LownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Harper v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Red Wing Manufacturing Co. v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Bourne v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canfield Lumber Co. v. Kint Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Cox v. Fleisher Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Armstrong v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Howell v. Blackfoot Creamery Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929