Legal Opinion

Matter of O'Esau v. . E.W. Bliss Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 20, 1919, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 20, 1919, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. John M. O’Esau, the deceased herein, was employed by the E. W. Bliss Company as a shell inspector, and on the 28th day of March, 1916, was rolling shells along a bench and caught his finger between two shells, causing a contusion of the third finger of the right hand. He continued working from the date of his injury until the 30th day of April,…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Hogan, Caedozo and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin and Andeews, JJ. Not voting: Hiscock, Ch. J.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Iannone v. Radory Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Mikolich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Claim of Whitmyre v. International Business MacHines Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Fossum v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mikolich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API