Legal Opinion

United States v. Bolden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2010No. 10-1357PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Patice Bolden (“Bolden”) pled guilty to one count of conspiring to distribute cocaine and one count of conspiring to commit money laundering for his part in a large drug-distribution scheme. During the sentencing hearing, the district court 1 found several enhancements, including a three-level enhancement for being a manager or supervisor of criminal activity and a two-level enhancement for using a minor to commit a crime, and sentenced him to a total term of incarceration of 280 months. Bolden now appeals, challenging the application of these two enhancements. We affirm.

I

In 2002, Bolden…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen Erhart, Also Known as Stephen Anthony ErhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. BirdineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Paul Kevin PierceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. PaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. GainesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Ismael Aldana MoralezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. AmayaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  5. United States v. Jovan DensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API