Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 61-88, (1988)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided October 14, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DARWIN L. ZWIEG, District Attorney Clark County

You have asked for my opinion concerning the appropriate procedures to be used in seeking forfeitures for violations of statutes.

You have noted that under section 778.01, Stats., "[w]here a forfeiture imposed by statute shall be incurred it may be recovered in a civil action unless the act or omission is punishable by fine and imprisonment or by fine or imprisonment." Specifically, you ask whether the appropriate summons to be used in such an action is the form in section 968.04(3)(b), or the one in section 801.095. Examples of the forfeiture…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Higher Educational Aids Board v. HerveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. Oag 34-89, (1989), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API