Legal Opinion

United States v. Pacheco

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 28, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-111; Court No.: 14-00289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:

Before the court is United States’ (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Default Judgment seeking $2,651,312.18 in civil penalties plus interest, costs, and fees against Defendant Jeanette Pacheco (“Pacheco”) for fraud under section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (2012).1 Pl.’s Mot. for Entry of Default J. at 6, July 7, 2015, ECF No. 9 (“PL’s Br.”). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is granted.

From October 29, 2009, to approximately December 23, 2009, Pacheco entered thirty six entries of dried peppers into the United States from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Pan Pacific Textile Group, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. United States v. Freight Forwarder International, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
  4. United States v. Country Flavor Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Katana Racing, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API