Legal Opinion
Brown v. City of Newark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 18, 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
113 N.J. 565 (1989)
552 A.2d 125
RICHARD BROWN AND ERNEST KING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 14, 1988.
Decided January 18, 1989.
Kathleen C. Goger argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Glenn A. Grant, Corporation Counsel, attorney).
Louis Raveson argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Louis Raveson, attorney; Edward McCardell, on the brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.
This…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.