Harger v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
¶ 1. The issue here is whether a manufacturer of component parts of a motor vehicle is subject to the Lemon Law. Wisconsin Stat. § 218.01(1)(L) (1997-98) 1 defines the type of manufacturer who is liable under the Lemon Law. We hold that a manufacturer of component parts who ships the completed part to the automobile manufacturer is not liable imder the statute. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of this case.
¶ 2. Clyde W. Harger purchased a 1992 Peterbilt Model 379 Tractor from Peterbilt of Wisconsin, Inc. Caterpillar, Inc., made the engine contained in Hanger's tractor. Peterbilt…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Dussault v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tagatz v. Township of Crystal LakeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Begalke v. Sterling Truck Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007