Legal Opinion

Harger v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 25, 2000No. 00-0536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

¶ 1. The issue here is whether a manufacturer of component parts of a motor vehicle is subject to the Lemon Law. Wisconsin Stat. § 218.01(1)(L) (1997-98) 1 defines the type of manufacturer who is liable under the Lemon Law. We hold that a manufacturer of component parts who ships the completed part to the automobile manufacturer is not liable imder the statute. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of this case.

¶ 2. Clyde W. Harger purchased a 1992 Peterbilt Model 379 Tractor from Peterbilt of Wisconsin, Inc. Caterpillar, Inc., made the engine contained in Hanger's tractor. Peterbilt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  2. Dussault v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tagatz v. Township of Crystal LakeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  2. Begalke v. Sterling Truck Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API