Legal Opinion

Succession of De Loach

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 13, 1943No. 36984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Ira DeLoach and the widow and heirs of Frank DeLoach instituted this proceeding against the Successions of Mr. and Mrs. John Alexander DeLoach, alleging that, prior to the death of Frank DeLoach, Ira and Frank DeLoach entered into a verbal agreement with their father, John Alexander DeLoach, under the terms of which the three of them (all of whom were carpenters) were to build a house upon Lot No. 12 of Block No. 2 of the Miller Addition in the Town of Haynesville, La., which lot was owned by the father; that Frank DeLoach and his father each were to receive 90 cents per hour…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vordenbaumen v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Laterriere v. Board of Levee Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Collier v. Administrator, Succession of BlevinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Reuter v. Reuter's SuccessionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Williams v. CollierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Rachal v. CharrierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Succession of OttsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API