Legal Opinion

Denton v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1904No. 13,605Published

Error from Cowley district court; C. L. Swarts, judge.

1Per curiam

In this case the surety was shown to be liable, whether the revivor proceedings were good or bad. The petition was not open to the charge of duplicity merely because it disclosed all the facts. The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of McCormick v. Fisher, 63 Kan. 199, 65 Pac. 223.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901