Legal Opinion

McOmber v. Chapman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Berrien. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

An action was duly commenced before a justice of the peace on a promissory note which had only two days to run before being outlawed. The service was not a legal service, but the justice ruled that it was valid and' gave judgment for the plaintiff. The circuit court reversed the judgment and the plaintiff brought a new suit within one year after the reversal on certiorari. The only question is whether the first proceedings and the reversal suspended the bar of the statute as against the last suit under Comp. L., § 7158.* *118The court below held that they did so, and error is charged on the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strottman v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Lenz v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Quarnberg v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Fay v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Domestic Finance Co. v. PurserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API