Legal Opinion

Craig ex rel. Boosel v. Farren

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1997No. 1264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from a trial court order sustaining preliminary objections and dismissing the complaint. The trial court ruled that the Boosels were not real parties in interest in this replevin action, according to Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 2002. Determining that Janice Craig is the real party in interest, we reverse and remand.

Walter and Eleanor Boosel were granted a power of attorney by their granddaughter Janice Craig, a Vermont resident, in an effort to institute the underlying action to recover personal property in Appellees’ possession. Appellees, Daniel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ham v. SulekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Kusmaul v. StullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Lore v. SobolevitchCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McIntyre Square Associates v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. McIntyre Square Associates v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Waterbucket v. NHSCASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API