Woodruff v. Tomlin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
616 F.2d 924
Joan WOODRUFF; Patricia Woodruff Hamilton and Louis
Hamilton, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Hewitt P. TOMLIN, Jr.; Homer H. Waldrop; Roy Hall; and David
R. Farmer, Individually and as Partners doing business under
the name and style of Waldrop, Hall, Tomlin & Farmer, a
Professional Business Association, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 77-1216.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 4, 1979.
Decided Feb. 21, 1980.
Norman Herring, Robert Stephan, Jr., Phoenix, Ariz., James F. Schaeffer, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Leo E. Bearman, Jr., John Thomason, Memphis,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Engel; Dissent · Merritt.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.