Legal Opinion

Herbert Land Co. v. Lorenzen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1906PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, The Herbert Land Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the_ 6th day of January,, 1906, opening a default and vacating a judgment entered thereon.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The established calendar ■ rules, printed on the calendars, of •the Trial Terms in Westchester county, the same as in Kings and Queens, are as follows :

The day calendar is made up of two sections, .one of causes ready for trial, and called the ready section, and the other of causes which appear on the day calendar for the first time, and which are not to be tried that day, but are.called at the opening of court to see if they are ready, and called the reserve section. Ho cause is tried until it gets on the ready section. All causes on the reserve section which are marked ready on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sutter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Warth v. Moore Blind Stitcher & Overseamer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Mott v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Demuth v. KempAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Miller v. SamsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  5. Union Stores Corp. v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API