Legal Opinion
Connally v. Reno
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 31, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 95-1314 (CRR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.Supp. 32 (1995)
Damien CONNALLY, Petitioner,
v.
Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, and Kathleen Hawk, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents.
Civ. A. No. 95-1314 (CRR).
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
August 31, 1995.
Damien Connally, Bradford, PA, pro se.
John Michael Facciola, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Janet Reno, Kathleen M. Hawk, Director Bureau of Prison.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the respondent's…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ex Parte EndoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vasquez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Ozoanya v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Combs v. Attorney General of USDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Foster v. United States Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kieran Thomas Smyth v. William BarrDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.