Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Uresti
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 3, 1979No. 5966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff (appellant) Ford Motor Credit Company sued (appellees) defendants Ures-ti and Hernandez alleging Uresti purchased a used Ford 4000 diesel tractor from Farmers Tractor and Equipment Company, executing a retail installment contract dated July 3, 1975 for same; that Farmers Tractor and Equipment Company transferred such installment contract to plaintiff; that Uresti was in arrears $2,978.80 on such contract; and that Uresti had transferred the tractor to Hernandez. Ford sought judgment for $2,978.80, $446. attorneys’ fees, and foreclosure of its lien…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Lockhart, State Tr. v. A.W. Snyder Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Bates v. First National Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Littlejohn v. KarielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moitie v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Irene W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marilyn Moitie, Individually, and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., D/B/A I. Magnin & Co. And Bullock's Northern California Saks & Company D/B/A Saks Fifth Avenue and Does I Through Xx, Floyd R. Brown, Individually, and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., D/B/A I. Magnin & Co. And Bullock's Saks & Company D/B/A Saks Fifth Avenue and Does I Through XxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980