Pangarakis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*80OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the possession of heroin. A prior offense of like character was alleged for enhancement. The punishment was assessed by the jury at forty-one years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Most of the complaints on appeal are in regard to the arrest and the seizure of heroin in appellant’s home.
The record reflects that Officers Gilbert Gonzales and K. R. Dunlap of the Houston Police Department had information that would indicate that someone was selling narcotics at 2121/2 Delmar Street in Houston. Upon investigation the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hathorne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Garrett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989
- Rushing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- John Anthony Hinojosa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978