Legal Opinion

Gerasimos v. Estate of Wartell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On July 1, 1918, plaintiffs executed and delivered to Moses Wartell a note for $6,000, payable in three years, with interest at 6 per cent. To secure this note, they executed a mortgage on certain real estate in the city of Detroit, which was duly acknowledged and recorded. Mr. Wartell died on December 21, 1921. Alleging that the mortgage had been paid in full, and that foreclosure proceedings were threatened, plaintiffs filed the bill herein, praying for a decree discharging it. The administrator of the estate and the widow, who was also made a defendant, answered, denying that the mortgage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frick v. Trustees of SchoolsIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Harvey v. QuickIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Martin v. PribilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Gerasimos v. Estate of WartellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gerasimos v. WartellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gerasimos v. WartellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API