People v. Washington
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.
*22Under the so-called Aranda / Bruton doctrine, a trial court may generally not allow a jury in a joint criminal trial of a defendant and *23codefendant to hear the unredacted confession of the codefendant that also directly implicates the defendant-even if the jury is instructed not to consider the confession as evidence against the defendant. ( People v. Aranda (1965) 63 Cal.2d 518, 529-531, 47 Cal.Rptr. 353, 407 P.2d 265 ( Aranda ), abrogated in part by Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (d); Bruton v. United States (1968) 391 U.S. 123, 128-136, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 ( Bruton ).) Such a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Gallardo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. GallardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. Ramos CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.