Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Quantrex Integrated Technology Group, Inc.
Virginia Circuit Court
Decided February 12, 2002No. Case No. (Law) CL01-169PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge D. Arthur Kelsey
The plaintiffs, Ronald and Janet Jackson, bring this action against Quantrex Integrated Technology Group, Inc., claiming it violated various provisions of a stock purchase contract, promissory note, and employment agreement.1 Quantrex demurs to the Jacksons’ claims in Counts in and IV of the Motion for Judgment on the ground that they constitute claims for indemnity and, as such, are “premature and inadequate” as a matter of law because the underlying obligations (allegedly triggering the indemnity) have not in fact been satisfied. For the following reasons, the Court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Yuzefovsky v. St. John's Wood ApartmentsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Skate America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Flippo v. F & L LAND CO.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Welding, Inc. v. Bland County Service AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rafuse v. Advanced Concepts and Technologies, International, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022