Legal Opinion

Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Rodriquez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1929No. 1827PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

In chambers, the judge of the Sixty-First judicial district of Harris county granted appellants a temporary injunction restraining appellees from collecting a judgment recovered by them in that court against appellants. Afterwards appel-lees filed in this cause what they designated their “Motion to Dissolve Injunction,” on the grounds: (1) “The original petition filed by plaintiffs herein fails to show any grounds for equitable relief prayed for;” and (2) “plaintiffs herein have an adequate remedy at law and are not entitled to the relief prayed for.” No answer was filed by appellees to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halcomb v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. City of Beaumont v. Sam's Loan Office, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n of MissouriCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Gene DeVoll v. Rebecca Demonbreun and Williams Dowds, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  4. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API