Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 19, 2019No. 8:18-cv-00343Unknown

1Opinion

IN TFHOER U TNHIET EDDIS STTRAICTETS O DFI NSTERBIRCATS CKOAU RT SARAH M. DIXON, Plaintiff, 8:18CV343 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Sarah M. Dixon’s (“Dixon”) Motion for an Order Reversing the Commissioner’s Decision (Filing No. 14) seeking judicial review of the final decision of defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying Dixon’s claim for benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 401

et…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API