Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Tlat, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 3, 2006No. CV-030241; A129320PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*520WOLLHEIM, P. J.
Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of our order dismissing his appeal. Plaintiffs motion raises the issue of whether a judgment that is nonappealable — due to the filing of motions for a new trial and for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) — remains enforceable. We grant plaintiffs motion and reinstate plaintiffs appeal.
A more detailed than usual discussion of the procedural history of this case is necessary. Plaintiff prevailed at trial. On March 16, 2005, before judgment was entered, defendant filed motions for a new trial and for JNOV.1 On March 30, 2005, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Welker Ex Rel. Bradbury v. Teachers Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Alternative Realty v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Kessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Way v. ProschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Lizama v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Thompson v. Tlat, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006