Legal Opinion

Moritz v. Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided November 5, 2014No. 13 CV 544Published

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, J.,

ORDER

Plaintiffs, Cynthia Moritz (“Moritz”), and her husband, George Moritz, have commenced this action against their insurer, Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“Horace Mann”), seeking underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits for injuries and losses that Moritz suffered in an automobile accident. (Docket entry no. 1). Moritz has collected the tortfeasor’s liability insurance policy limits of $15,000.00, and seeks to recover UIM benefits from Horace Mann for her damages which exceed the tortfeasor’s policy limits of $15,000.00. {Id. at ¶¶6-15, 17-19,21-22).

By order dated…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API