Legal Opinion
Crane Co. v. Baker
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 14, 1903No. 940PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Circuit Judge.
The claim and so much of the specification as relates thereto are as follows:
“In car-heating apparatus it has heretofore been usual to provide an expansion-vessel above the body of the car, into which the pipes from the heating apparatus ascend, so that the water circulates through the expansion-vessel in heating the car. There is more or less leakage in the apparatus, involving a loss of water that has to be made up from time to time by filling water into such expansion-vessel to keep the same at the proper height; and a supply-cock has been used with a funnel connected…
2Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- French American, Etc., Co. v. Park Plastics Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Congleton v. Pura-Tex Stone Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Testut v. TestutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Foster v. T. L. Smith Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.