Legal Opinion

Abshire v. Cline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This was an action for slander, by Cline against the plaintiff in error.

The declaration contained .two counts. The first count charged that the defendant had spoken words of and con*116cerning the plaintiff, importing that the defendant had committed fornication with the plaintiff.

The words alleged to have been spoken, by the second count, were as follows : “ Sarah Jane” (meaning the plaintiff) “told me” (the defendant) “ that her brothers” (meaning certain brothers of the plaintiff before mentioned) “had” (using obscene words importing carnal intercourse) “ with her; thereby then and there…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drummond v. LeslieIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Abrams v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Burke v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charleson v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Murphy v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API