City of Miami v. A. M. Tenney and Demarest Holding
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BUFORD, J.:
The appeal brings for review orders confirming Master’s Report and supplemental report holding special assessments levied for the construction of a street to be invalid and requiring the City to make return to those who had paid special assessments and who filed their claims as required by Order of Court.
There are two questions involved. The first is, whether or not the special assessments were valid; and the second question is, whether or not the suit can be maintained by the named plaintiffs as a class suit for benefit of themselves and all others like situated.
The history of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abell v. Town of BoyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Wiggins v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- City of St. Cloud v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Escott v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Stockman v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Frankel v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Port Royal, Inc. v. ConboyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Tenney v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Larson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Watnick v. Florida Commercial Banks, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.