Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated February 17, 2011, as granted the separate motions of the de*737fendants City of New York, Consolidated Edison Company, TriMessine Construction, Co., and Safeway Construction Enterprises, Inc., which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The plaintiff Grace E. Weinberg…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cendales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Shvartsberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lawler v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Palone v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crawford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Gonzalez v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Crawford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Godino v. Kipel Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Godino v. Kipel Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013