Legal Opinion
Boice v. Conover
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
■ Emery, Y. C.
The dispute in this case relates to the respective’ priorities of two chattel mortgages and of a judgment and execution creditor; one chattel mortgage being held by complainants, one by the defendant Edwin Allen and the execution creditor being the defendant the Mapes Formula and Guano Company. Both chattel mortgages were given by the defendants Cornelius N. Conover and William Allen, partners as Conover & Allen, the complainants’ mortgage being dated on October 21st, 1893, and recorded October 25th, 1893, subsequent to the defendant Allen’s-mortgage, which was dated September…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dorr v. ShawNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
- Perrine v. First National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Holmes v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanber v. Sims Magneto Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. AugelliNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Naslund v. Moon Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Progress Press Brick & MacHine Co. v. SpragueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Sherman v. Union County, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931