Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Continental Casualty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1936No. 5115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

In our former opinion we dismissed the contention of. defendant that the automobile which was in the accident was hired or leased by the defendant and therefore not covered by the insurance policy, without fully discussing this question; We did so because we considered the contention wholly without merit. Defendant applied for a rehearing on this point alone, and, due to the fact that we had not, in our former opinion, fully discussed it, we granted a rehearing.

To the policy is attached a rider which is headed, “Non-ownership Automobile Liability,” in which it provides that the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Miller v. SUPERIOR SHIPYARD AND FABRICATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Lipscomb v. News Star World Pub. CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Gore v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Dupre v. MaynardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API