Legal Opinion

Matter of Plummer

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1992No. 86-FM-1697, 87-FM-1239, 87-FM-1423, 88-FM-642 and 88-FM-1565PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

In these consolidated appeals, appellant Donald Plummer, a civilly committed adult, raises several challenges to the validity of his commitment as an involuntary inpatient at Saint Elizabeths Hospital (“the Hospital”). He contends that (1) the court order revoking his earlier outpatient commitment was invalid because the Hospital failed to file a timely revocation petition after appellant was returned to the institution; (2) the revocation order was invalid because the Hospital failed to demonstrate at the revocation hearing that indefinite inpatient commitment was the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. EllerbeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Application of TrueIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Meisel v. KremensDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In Re JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. KiddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Bible Way Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ of Apostolic Faith of Washington v. BeardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Tenants of 1255 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API