Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Sease

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 14, 2015No. 45512-9-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

¶1 — Michael Sease was civilly committed under the Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) Act, chapter 71.09 RCW, in 2007. At his show cause hearing in 2013, the trial court concluded that the State had presented prima facie evidence showing Sease still met the definition of an SVP. *32The trial court further concluded that Sease had not established probable cause to believe his condition had so changed that he no longer met the definition of an SVP. Based on the plain language of RCW 71.09.090, and the recent opinion from our Supreme Court In re Personal Restraint of Meirhofer, 182 Wn.2d 632, 343 P.3d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Detention of Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re Detention of StoutWashington Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Detention of LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. In re Detention of LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. In re Det. of SeaseWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re the Detention of SeaseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Lieberman v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API