Legal Opinion
Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
1. The plaintiff is a Delaware corporation authorized to conduct business in the State of New York, and maintains an office for the transaction of business in the City, County and State of New York.
2. The defendant is a Maryland insurance corporation authorized to conduct the business of casualty insurance in the State of New York, and maintains .an office for that purpose in the City, •County and State of New York.
3. On February 13, 1958, the date on •which this action was removed from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Six Companies of Cal. v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Dewey HuittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Cenno v. W. VIRGINIA PAPER & PULP CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- McCloskey and Company v. Allstate Insurance Companies, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Eastern Chemicals, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.