Legal Opinion

United States v. Contents of Account Number Xxxxxxxxx

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 16, 1999No. 98 Civ. 5416(RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Kil Young Maeng (“Maeng”) has moved, on behalf of Han Kuk Kuen Young, Inc. (“Han Kuk”) and Interlink Finance Co. (“Interlink”), for an enlargement of time to file a claim in this civil forfeiture action. For the reasons stated below, Maeng’s motion is denied.

Background

This action seeks the forfeiture of the contents of three bank accounts and $22,782.00 in United States currency (collectively, the “defendant-in-rem funds”) seized by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in 1992 from Han Kuk and Interlink, two check cashing services controlled by Maeng. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. Beechcraft Queen Airplane Serial Number Ld-24Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Hilda Amiel, Kathryn Amiel, Joanne Amiel, and Sarina AmielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. BorromeoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Various Computers and Computer Equipment, Paris Francis LundisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. US v. CurrencyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API