Legal Opinion

Sovik v. Shaughnessy. Smith v. Shaughnessy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 23, 1951No. 22038_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases were reargued in the District Court to afford the plaintiffs the opportunity to raise the question as to the applicability of Section 107(a) of the Revenue Code. As a result of the reargument the original decision was adhered to and the complaints were dismissed.

The taxpayers were each special partners in a law firm which represented the executors of the Estate of Daniel M. Edwards, deceased, from May 27, 1929, to June 13, 1932. As such special partner? they had no interest in any accounts receivable or other assets of the firm at any time. Their interest was confined solely to a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. Richard T. Graham v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Thompson Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  4. Van Hook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Raymond T. Zillmer v. United States of America, John M. Redford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API