United States v. Akbar
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Dissent
BAKER, Judge,*
with whom ERDMANN, Chief Judge, joins (dissenting):
Principle is hardest to hold in the face of countervailing virtue. For a judge that moment may arrive when knowing what is just, one must also consider what is fair. This is a ease about whether or not the military justice system was fair, not whether it was -just.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant raises fifty-nine issues on appeal. This Court heard oral argument on five issues. However, in my view, there is but one pivotal question: Did defense counsel provide ineffective assistance of counsel in the manner in which they presented…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.