Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Akbar

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 19, 2015No. 13-7001/ARPublished

1Dissent

BAKER, Judge,*

with whom ERDMANN, Chief Judge, joins (dissenting):

Principle is hardest to hold in the face of countervailing virtue. For a judge that moment may arrive when knowing what is just, one must also consider what is fair. This is a ease about whether or not the military justice system was fair, not whether it was -just.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant raises fifty-nine issues on appeal. This Court heard oral argument on five issues. However, in my view, there is but one pivotal question: Did defense counsel provide ineffective assistance of counsel in the manner in which they presented…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API