Legal Opinion

Davis v. New York State Railways

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, J.:

In this negligence case the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that the plaintiff’s intestate was shown to have been guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. The only question before us relates to the conduct of the deceased. Ordinarily in cases of this kind the question of contributory negligence is one of fact for the jury. (Massoth v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co., 64 N. Y. 524.) “ If any possible hypothesis based on the evidence forbids the imputation of fault to .the deceased, as matter of law, the question is for the jury.” (Chamberlain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massoth v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Chamberlain v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Carr v. . Pennsylvania R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Lofsten v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shindler v. Sullivan County Light & Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API