Legal Opinion

Wackenhut Corp. v. Schisler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 1992No. 91-3895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, Judge.

Appellants, the employer and carrier in this workers’ compensation case, seek review of an order directing them to pay a fee to claimant’s attorney. We agree that the record does not contain competent substantial evidence to sustain the conclusion that the employer and carrier acted in bad faith regarding the claim for permanent total disability benefits. Therefore, we reverse.

In 1991, claimant’s attorney requested attorney fees in connection with a claim which had been filed in 1987, alleging underpayment due to an erroneous calculation of claimant’s average weekly wage; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Samper v. WB Johnson Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Volusia Memorial Park v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Doctor's Hospital of Sarasota v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. US Sugar CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Central Maintenance & Welding v. SimmonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API