Legal Opinion

State v. Norwood

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 21, 2005No. 2004AP1073-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. Van G. Norwood appeals from a judgment of conviction for sexual assault of a child and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He makes three claims: (1) that he was entitled to a substitution of judge because his substitution request came prior to any preliminary contested matter; (2) that his letter to the court offering to plead guilty, which contained inculpatory statements, should not have been admitted because our state statutes prohibit such evidence from coming in; and (3) that it was improper for the State to put on "other acts" evidence in its case-in-chief…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. HaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. AgnelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Milwaukee v. KilgoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calabro v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. Tavodess MatthewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. State v. Raphfeal Lyfold MyrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API