Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Bartsch

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from, the Wayne Circuit'Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

The only question involved in this appeal has already been fully determined by this court, in the cases of Smith v. Smith, 23 Ind. 202, and McMackin v. Michaels, id., 462. It was there held that “those ohly who were of the blood of the ancestor last seized could inherit.” In the case under consideration, the Coffman children are of the blood of the ancestor last seized, and are entitled to inherit equally with the children by her second husband. The appellants attempt to apply sec. 6 of the law of descents, 1 G. & H. 292, as controlling, but that section governs the inheritance only as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClanahan v. TraffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Barnes v. LoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API