Kinney v. Hudson River Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion by plaintiff for leave to serve an amended complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
The plaintiff moves for permission to serve an amended complaint setting up the fact that he was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of his accident and increasing the amount of damage's demanded from $30,000 to $50,000.
The action has been tried three times, and three several juries have rendered verdicts in favor of the plaintiff. On the 29th day of February, 1916', a decision was rendered by the Court of Appeals, *13reversing the last judgment, and directing that another trial be had. Kinney v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 217 N. Y. 325.
The action was brought on the 30th day of June,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Damiano v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Luce v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Kent v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Keith v. Texas P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Kent v. Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.