In re the Estate of Shumway
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The chief basis of the contest in this proceeding, while by no means unprecedented, is sufficiently unusual as to furnish a welcome variation from the commonplace of objections to testamentary dispositions. The first stated grounds of contest are the customary ones — that the propounded instrument is not the last will of the testator and that it was procured by undue influence. To those is added an unusual one, to the effect that its provisions were the result of a mistake of fact on the part of the decedent, in that item “ Fourth ” of the will stated: “ As I have already advanced…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Clapp v. . FullertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Matter of DurandNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In Re the Accounting of TamargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In Re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of HowellsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of StulmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of MihlmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of PattersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.