Legal Opinion

Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal brought by Insurance Company of North America, Inc. (“INA”), and Travelers Casualty & Surety Company (“Travelers”) as successor in interest to United Pacific Insurance Company (“United Pacific”). The issue this appeal presents is whether the trial court erred when it found that a supersedeas bond Mergentime Corporation (“contractor”) and INA procured in 1995 from United Pacific remained in force in December of 2000 under the facts this case presents. Finding no error, we affirm. In order properly to address the issues this appeal raises, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Atlas MacHine & Iron Works, Inc. And Williams Enterprises, Inc., in Re Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Frank B. Bozzo, Inc. v. Electric Weld DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Coventry Township v. TripodiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. M. Humphreys, Ins. Comm'r. of the Com. of PA v. SureTec Ins. Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API