Legal Opinion
General Electric Co. v. DORR
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1966No. 20,350Published
1Opinion
On Petition foe Reheaeing
Bierly, J.
— Appellant, in its Petition for Rehearing, alleges that this court erred in summarizing the facts, to-wit:
“Bernard Kneer and Mr. Krisher informed appellees that although nothing was wrong with the unit except a faulty compressor, it would be necessary to install a new unit as required by ‘company policy’ of the General Electric Company.”
Appellant contends that the above statement is not based upon the record. Upon a re-examination of this case, and particularly the transcript, we have found many passages of testimony which supports our summary;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Wheatcraft v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- General Electric Co. v. DORRIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Romine v. ThayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.