Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. DORR

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1966No. 20,350Published

1Opinion

On Petition foe Reheaeing

Bierly, J.

— Appellant, in its Petition for Rehearing, alleges that this court erred in summarizing the facts, to-wit:

“Bernard Kneer and Mr. Krisher informed appellees that although nothing was wrong with the unit except a faulty compressor, it would be necessary to install a new unit as required by ‘company policy’ of the General Electric Company.”

Appellant contends that the above statement is not based upon the record. Upon a re-examination of this case, and particularly the transcript, we have found many passages of testimony which supports our summary;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wheatcraft v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. General Electric Co. v. DORRIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Romine v. ThayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API