Georgia Department of Human Resources v. Sistrunk
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentSmith, Justice
The sole issue presented to this court is whether an attorney who is also a member of the Georgia General Assembly must be disqualified from representing a client in a superior court when the opposing party is the State of Georgia. Although the majority concedes that nothing in the Code of Professional Responsibility would be violated by Hill’s representation of the Sistrunks, it interprets Art. I, Sec. II, Par. I of our Constitution (Code Ann. § 2-201) to prohibit “a legislator from representing a client for his own financial gain, in any civil transaction or matter wherein the State of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cambron v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Blumenfeld v. BorensteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Mayor of Macon v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.